View Full Version : North Korea torpedoed the Lousianna oil rig....
Thoughts (about the story)?
Keep in mind that SWAT was sent in to protect all of the other rigs in the area though you would expect engineers to have gone in to figure out what happened. It's been several, several days and only what is going on but not what happened. There are ridiculous amounts of technology that signals when anything is even remotely going haywire and out of it's perimeters. I was listening to an interview with some of the crew and they were explaining this and that there was not a single thing going wrong or even the least bit abnormal before the explosion. Sounds a little fishy.
European Untion Times
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/05/us-orders-blackout-over-north-korean-torpedoing-of-gulf-of-mexico-oil-rig/
European Union Times
April 30th, 2010
Pat Dollard
Kremlin Report:
Says North Korea Torpedoed Louisiana Oil Rig,
Obama Orders Media Blackout
A grim report circulating in the Kremlin today written by Russia's Northern Fleet is reporting that the United States has ordered a complete media blackout over North Korea's torpedoing of the giant Deepwater Horizon oil platform owned by the World's largest offshore drilling contractor Transocean that was built and financed by South Korea's Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., that has caused great loss of life, untold billions in economic damage to the South Korean economy, and an environmental catastrophe to the United States.
Most important to understand about this latest attack by North Korea against its South Korean enemy is that under the existing laws of war it was a permissible action as they remain in a state of war against each other due to South Korea's refusal to sign the 1953 Armistice ending the Korean War.
To the attack itself, these reports continue, the North Korean cargo vessel Dai Hong Dan believed to be staffed by 17th Sniper Corps suicide troops left Cuba's Empresa Terminales Mambisas de La Habana (Port of Havana) on April 18th whereupon it severely deviated from its intended course for Venezuela's Puerto Cabello bringing it to within 209 kilometers (130 miles) of the Deepwater Horizon oil platform which was located 80 kilometers (50 miles) off the coast of the US State of Louisiana where it launched an SSC Sang-o Class Mini Submarine (Yugo class) estimated to have an operational range of 321 kilometers (200 miles).
On the night of April 20th the North Korean Mini Submarine manned by these suicidal 17th Sniper Corps soldiers attacked the Deepwater Horizon with what are believed to be 2 incendiary torpedoes causing a massive explosion and resulting in 11 workers on this giant oil rig being killed outright. Barely 48 hours later, on April 22nd , this North Korean Mini Submarine committed its final atrocity by exploding itself directly beneath the Deepwater Horizon causing this $1 Billion oil rig to sink beneath the seas and marking 2010's celebration of Earth Day with one of the largest environmental catastrophes our World has ever seen.
To the reason for North Korea attacking the Deepwater Horizon, these reports say, was to present US President Obama with an impossible dilemma prior to the opening of the United Nations Review Conference of the Parties to the Treat on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) set to begin May 3rd in New York.
This impossible dilemma facing Obama is indeed real as the decision he is faced with is either to allow the continuation of this massive oil leak catastrophe to continue for months, or immediately stop it by the only known and proven means possible, the detonation of a thermonuclear device.
Russian Navy atomic experts in these reports state that should Obama choose the nuclear option the most viable weapon at his disposal is the United States B83 (Mk-83) strategic thermonuclear bomb having a variable yield (Low Kiloton Range to 1,200 Kilotons) which with its 12 foot length and 18 inch diameter, and weighing just over 2,400 pounds, is readily able to be deployed and detonated by a remote controlled mini-sub.
Should Obama choose the nuclear option it appears that he would be supported by the International Court of Justice who on July 8, 1996 issued an advisory opinion on the use of nuclear weapons stating that they could not conclude definitively on these weapons use in extreme circumstances or self defense.
On the other hand, if Obama chooses the nuclear option it would leave the UN's nuclear conference in shambles with every Nation in the World having oil rigs off their coasts demanding an equal right to atomic weapons to protect their environment from catastrophes too, including Iran.
To whatever decision Obama makes it remains a fact that with each passing hour this environmental catastrophe grows worse. And even though Obama has ordered military SWAT teams to protect other oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico from any further attack, and further ordered that all drilling in the Gulf of Mexico be immediately stopped, this massive oil spill has already reached the shores of America and with high waves and more bad weather forecast the likelihood of it being stopped from destroying thousands of miles of US coastland and wildlife appears unstoppable.
And not just to the environmental catastrophe that is unfolding the only devastation to be wrecked upon the United States and South Korea by this North Korean attack as the economic liabilities associated with this disaster are estimated by these Russian reports to be between $500 Billion to $1.5 Trillion, and which only a declaration of this disaster being an act of war would free some the World's largest corporations from bankruptcy.
Important to note too in all of these events was that this was the second attack by North Korea on its South Korean enemy, and US ally, in a month as we had reported on in our March 28th report titled Obama Orders Immediate Stand-down After Deadly North Korean Attack and which to date neither the Americans or South Korea have retaliated for and giving one senior North Korean party leader the courage to openly state that the North Korean military took gratifying revenge on South Korea.
And for those believing that things couldn't get worse, they couldn't be more mistaken as new reports coming from Japanese military sources are stating that North Korea is preparing for new launches of its 1,300 kilometer (807 miles) intermediate range ballistic Rodong missile which Russian Space Forces experts state is able to deploy and detonate an atomic electromagnetic pulse (EMP) device, and which if detonated high in the atmosphere could effectively destroy the American economy for years, if not decades, to come.
KingDirty
04.05.2010, 21:58
bullshit.
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0504/russian-paper-suggests-nuclear-explosion-cut-gulf-oil-geyser/
The same writer claims that the US had an earthquake machine test in Haiti...
bakerized
04.05.2010, 21:59
I wonder how hyundai car sales will be this year.
http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2009/1/12/633673729262531831-TinfoilHat.jpg
...
I wonder how hyundai car sales will be this year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyundai_Motor_Company
Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, Hyundai operates the world’s largest integrated automobile manufacturing facility in Ulsan, which is capable of producing 1.6 million units annually
Retard
north korea would never do that unless they thought they could take on the united states...
unsubstantiated trash, masquerading as news. i especially loved the parts about the mini submarine suicide squad, somehow fixing the leak with a nuke, and the threat of atmospheric emp's.
chimbaktu
04.05.2010, 23:42
good troll. i always had my doubts. well played, sir.
jonathan
04.05.2010, 23:48
I loved that part where the asians were there. in their cute submarines. possibly practicing ping pong.
ryanmatthewdaily
04.05.2010, 23:54
Submarines caused 9/11
jonathan
04.05.2010, 23:55
Submarines caused 9/11
:LOL:
Chris Fortune
04.05.2010, 23:56
kimchi chigae?
2 Chainz
05.05.2010, 01:35
I'm down for conspiracies that make sense,
but I don't know about this one... :?:-|:?
Titties 'N' Beer
05.05.2010, 01:52
Biggest load of shit I've seen in a while.
Obama has two options, set of a nuke or let oil ravage an ecosystem.
Get the fuck out of here.
2 Chainz
05.05.2010, 01:54
Obama has two options, set of a nuke or let oil ravage an ecosystem.
this.
jakeordie
05.05.2010, 02:09
Thoughts?
I can see why you're requesting donations.
Here's the kernel of truth the ridiculousness stems from.
http://trueslant.com/juliaioffe/2010/05/04/nuke-that-slick/
Apparently nuking the ground is a previously successful method of closing these things up.
I'm more likely to believe this is just the result of some ridiculously unfortunate human error. They were doing cement work on the rig the day of the explosion. This could have just been the result of lazy/faulty work.
anton_mr
05.05.2010, 05:46
This could have just been the result of lazy/faulty work.
Which raises the illegal immigration question once again
*ROYALwithCHEESE*
05.05.2010, 06:43
Im betting it was a U-boat!
Ze germans!
You actually believe this? They need to just ban the internet in Alabama.
You actually believe this? They need to just ban the internet in Alabama.
.
Supernintendo Chalmers
05.05.2010, 13:23
aliens blew up the rig so they could distract us while they rape our white women.
This could have just been the result of lazy/faulty work.
goddamn unions
Jake The Snake
05.05.2010, 14:02
color me stupid, but maybe man wasnt made to drill 5000 feet to the ocean floor for oil.
jonathan
05.05.2010, 14:40
color me stupid, but maybe man wasnt made to drill 5000 feet to the ocean floor for oil.
http://colourlovers.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/crowded_crayon_colors.jpg
Take yer pick
color me stupid, but maybe man wasnt made to drill 5000 feet to the ocean floor for oil.
Probably weren't meant to fly either, but look at his guy. He's fucking loving life!
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i319/4x4sauce/happypilot1259074075.jpg
jonathan
05.05.2010, 14:59
now
http://colourlovers.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/crowded_crayon_colors.jpg
Take yer pick
You goofs. I know you guys can read better than that or you just enjoy putting words in my mouth. I never once said I believed it but rather considering all the surrounding events and information, the regimes handling of the situation sounded "fishy" which last time I checked wasn't synonymous with "true."
Some of you guys love to bash on me for knowing as concrete truth what some of you term conspiracy "theories." No problem there, I can take that but I find it just as amusing that the ones that you guy have called "theories" and I call true have been ridiculously well recorded and documented from everyone from the founders of such "conspiratorial groups," to FDR, Kennedy, Bush, Clintons, the Rockefelles, Rothschilds, the UN's founders, Bush, the CFR (and their publication Foreign Affairs.) When pressed on it, I've provided plenty of video footage of discussions b/w those involved with them, news reports from sources that most of you take as the mouth of truth, links to the bills on our own government websites, and oogles of other sources that support this truth, and yet that info goes undisputed and the personal bashing starts back in.
To jakeordie:After the thread last week when you posted multiple times in reference to a "conspiracy" that you tried to pin me down to but couldn't/wouldn't, I had planned on leaving these two little guys that might require you to eat your words:
CNBC http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hiPrsc9g98
One of the tons of reports that CNN has ran on the Amero, the NAU ect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H65f3q_Lm9U
History Channel on NWO groups that runs the shit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxsx0tFR7E
Ban the internet in Alabama? Atleast they are getting closer. The FCC just lost their battle in what they said is their ability to regulate and control the internet. No worry though, the Obama regime this week just chose to "reclassify" the internet as a utility and thus grabbed it.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704370704575228152292941636.html <---Wall Street Journal.
mitchdchapman
08.05.2010, 14:27
http://images.4chan.org/b/src/1273344161256.jpg whats next?
jakeordie
08.05.2010, 14:44
Dude, you posted a fake novelty coin as proof of the mainstream fear fodder you believe.....and you do it because you know something we don't and we're supposed to listen & learn?
I hate on your posts because you can't discern the real conspiracies from the disinformation. Here's a test for you;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcxhcMyn8rU
:|
Grindguru
08.05.2010, 15:07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcxhcMyn8rU
Next level conspiracy
gen2roller
08.05.2010, 15:14
obama bin laden whaa?
tonyrivituso
08.05.2010, 15:15
Next level conspiracy
teh purple conspiracy??
You goofs. I know you guys can read better than that or you just enjoy putting words in my mouth. I never once said I believed it but rather considering all the surrounding events and information, the regimes handling of the situation sounded "fishy" which last time I checked wasn't synonymous with "true."
Some of you guys love to bash on me for knowing as concrete truth what some of you term conspiracy "theories." No problem there, I can take that but I find it just as amusing that the ones that you guy have called "theories" and I call true have been ridiculously well recorded and documented from everyone from the founders of such "conspiratorial groups," to FDR, Kennedy, Bush, Clintons, the Rockefelles, Rothschilds, the UN's founders, Bush, the CFR (and their publication Foreign Affairs.) When pressed on it, I've provided plenty of video footage of discussions b/w those involved with them, news reports from sources that most of you take as the mouth of truth, links to the bills on our own government websites, and oogles of other sources that support this truth, and yet that info goes undisputed and the personal bashing starts back in.
To jakeordie:After the thread last week when you posted multiple times in reference to a "conspiracy" that you tried to pin me down to but couldn't/wouldn't, I had planned on leaving these two little guys that might require you to eat your words:
CNBC http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hiPrsc9g98
One of the tons of reports that CNN has ran on the Amero, the NAU ect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H65f3q_Lm9U
History Channel on NWO groups that runs the shit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNxsx0tFR7E
Ban the internet in Alabama? Atleast they are getting closer. The FCC just lost their battle in what they said is their ability to regulate and control the internet. No worry though, the Obama regime this week just chose to "reclassify" the internet as a utility and thus grabbed it.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704370704575228152292941636.html <---Wall Street Journal.
"The Amero" sounds it would make our continent more like Europe, where you don't have to pay fees and fill out a bunch of bullshit paperwork just to cross imaginary borders, and you don't have to pay money to exchanging cash into a different currency. Seems like something worth thinking about.
Dude, you posted a fake novelty coin as proof of the mainstream fear fodder you believe.....and you do it because you know something we don't and we're supposed to listen & learn?
I hate on your posts because you can't discern the real conspiracies from the disinformation. Here's a test for you;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcxhcMyn8rU
:|
What is this mainstream fear fodder I'm following? I posted a picture of a coin. This was in no way intended as proof of any kind. When there is something that I know as truth and you guys know as conspiracy theory, I always provide more info. I don't just post a simple pic or just state the conspiracy and leave only my believe as the foundation of truth it's based on. That was just a picture.
Now, you made the point a few times in the last post about my "conspiracy" being b.s. yet I never named a conspiracy as you continued to try and shoot holes in this theory (which one again?). You take the tone as several others when you put words in my mouth, make the case that those are my words and then argue the validity of the statements.
A test? Here's mine...
Do you believe that there is a push for a one world government? Is there a push for a one world economy?Would you argue there is not a push for a North American Union modeled after the European Union? Do you know what the Libson treaty is and how it was passed? Do you believe that the UN's founders envisioned this and have actively been working towards this goal? Has Gordon Brown, the Pope, George Bush, ect called for the necessity of such? Has the dollar lost over 90% of it's value since the creation of the Federal Reserve? Is the Euro in trouble on and knowing that so many other countries currencies are given value based on the fact that the US greenback is backing them, would defaulting on our debts set the US and possibly many of the other countries in a downward spiral spiral?
Does the UN pushing for a global gun grab? Did Barack and Hillary not just give their full support of a small arms ban?
Please tell me how you contrast a "real conspiracy" with disinformation? You've charged me with making that error, so please continue the hating by point out at least one thing that I have said I believe is true that you know to be just a conspiracy and nothing more.
Did you happen to check out any of the three links I posted?
http://www.ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/north-american-free-trade-agreement-nafta
jakeordie
08.05.2010, 16:29
What is this mainstream fear fodder I'm following?
The links you keep posting that you want us to follow with you.
Please tell me how you contrast a "real conspiracy" with disinformation?
Do you even know the purpose of the history channel?
Please continue the hating by point out at least one thing that I have said I believe is true that you know to be just a conspiracy and nothing more.
I've already done this, you wouldn't be so butthurt if I hadn't. "I posted a picture of a coin. This was in no way intended as proof of any kind." Fucking LOL.
Now, you made the point a few times in the last post about my "conspiracy" being b.s. yet I never named a conspiracy.
All you do is name conspiracy theories, that you can't back up with rational independent thought.
Do you believe that there is a push for a one world government? Is there a push for a one world economy?Would you argue there is not a push for a North American Union modeled after the European Union? Do you know what the Libson treaty is and how it was passed? Do you believe that the UN's founders envisioned this and have actively been working towards this goal? Has Gordon Brown, the Pope, George Bush, ect called for the necessity of such? Has the dollar lost over 90% of it's value since the creation of the Federal Reserve? Is the Euro in trouble on and knowing that so many other countries currencies are given value based on the fact that the US greenback is backing them, would defaulting on our debts set the US and possibly many of the other countries in a downward spiral spiral? Does the UN pushing for a global gun grab? Did Barack and Hillary not just give their full support of a small arms ban?
If this is your response to the test, you fail.
Did you happen to check out any of the three links I posted?
Yes, that's why I gave you the test 'cos I knew you were gonna fail.
The links you keep posting that you want us to follow with you.
Do you even know the purpose of the history channel?
I've already done this, you wouldn't be so butthurt if I hadn't. "I posted a picture of a coin. This was in no way intended as proof of any kind." Fucking LOL.
All you do is name conspiracy theories, that you can't back up with rational independent thought.
If this is your response to the test, you fail.
Yes, that's why I gave you the test 'cos I knew you were gonna fail.
Lol, you idiot. You have just completely a terrible job at picking apart my post. Butthurt? You call bs on my "conspiracy theories", I provide further proof, and you come back with all of this shit? Guy, come on now. You just can't name, the "conspiracy" that I'm claiming as truth can you? Do you not want to because you obviously must see that there is serious talk about it? Is it the Amero that you are insisting is just some conspiracy?
By who's definition are we using that defines rational, independent thought? Because I see truth as so many others do, undeniable proof and yet you refuse to see it. There are none so blind as those who will not see...
jakeordie
08.05.2010, 17:16
You just can't name, the "conspiracy" that I'm claiming as truth can you? Do you not want to because you obviously must see that there is serious talk about it? Is it the Amero that you are insisting is just some conspiracy?
If you still have to ask, you are dumber than I have imagined.
By who's definition are we using that defines rational, independent thought?
By the definition of one whose command of the English language is greater than Ralph Wiggum's.....but you don't need it to "see truth" because TV will translate into pretty pictures and dramatic sounds for FREE!
Because I see truth as so many others do, undeniable proof and yet you refuse to see it. There are none so blind as those who will not see...
http://www.dc-coin.com/unaameropatterncoins.aspx
You are exposed.
Mudhut Jollyrancher
08.05.2010, 17:20
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
Charlie Hustles
08.05.2010, 17:22
to "see truth" . . . TV
:lol:
I have no interest in being in any sort of union with Canada or Mexico.
Dude, you posted a fake novelty coin as proof of the mainstream fear fodder you believe.....and you do it because you know something we don't and we're supposed to listen & learn?
I hate on your posts because you can't discern the real conspiracies from the disinformation. Here's a test for you;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcxhcMyn8rU
:|
Nice. I just clicked for shits and giggles video. While I certainly laugh at the idea that Obama is Osama, I do think you might be surprised that...
His homeland is Kenya, or so says Michelle (2008): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLDHDfPNBME
Or possibly the Ambassador of Kenya:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikg6gj71U9k
57 states? Just a slip up surely. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws\
A slightly bigger slip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I
I'm sure you expect that the idea of him having being a "marxist/socialist/commy is conspiracy too?
I have no interest in being in any sort of union with Canada or Mexico.
Neither do I and I honestly doubt that many would if they knew the further implications and consequences of this goal.
Vicente Fox (Mexico's last president) on Larry King hinting at Amero and goal for NAU.
jj Johnson speaks to the Senate about those redneck militia.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bew_9GeuGA4
knockoutmouse
09.05.2010, 03:55
what's the issue with a union with Mexico and Canada or even beyond?
the same principles are working pretty well in Europe, enhanced rule of law across the continent, redistribution of wealth and a decrease in disparity between living standards, labour mobility, better cultural understanding, the democratising effect it is having on it's non eu neighbours. e.g. Serbia, and most importantly it's led to France, Germany and UK actually collaborating with one another. Their are issues with how it's run but it's a really new institution, Just look at the evolution of the Federal government of the US, from nearly going bankrupt to the power it wields now.
Simply put we are stronger together than in competition
P.S. I'd like to hear what you feel as the 'implications of this goal'
Oh and so what if Obama is more socialist? Remember socialism is a matter of degree not an either/or, I can't imagine you complain too much about the socialist highway system or socialised police. Relative to the rest of the world (where their are quite a few countries run along socialist principles successfully) Obama is right wing and will remain so whatever his own personal predilections, mainly because moderate American is right
bilbo baggins
09.05.2010, 04:42
all of your arguments are invalid due to the linking of youtube videos...
*ROYALwithCHEESE*
09.05.2010, 04:45
parrotting shit you hear from others is not a hobby.
when you scamps get together, you're worse than a sewing circle
You get bashed because once a month when the Chlorpromazine aint working you post outlandish claims about shit that will never change.
If the world had corruption years ago with the rockafellas (not doubting it), what will you do about it now?
Im sure enlightening a bunch of binge drinking, drug taking, sexually deviated rollerbladers (not bad things!!!!) will totally change the world.
jakeordie
09.05.2010, 06:23
Nice. I just clicked for shits and giggles video. While I certainly laugh at the idea that Obama is Osama,
Why are you laughing?
I do think you might be surprised that...
You don't think, and who would be surprised by the same old story broadcast into hundreds of millions of homes worldwide?
I'm sure you expect that the idea of him having being a "marxist/socialist/commy is conspiracy too?
If you're so sure, why put a question mark after your statement? You're oblivious to my position on any issue you've raised.
Supernintendo Chalmers
09.05.2010, 07:53
what's the issue with a union with Mexico and Canada or even beyond?
the same principles are working pretty well in Europe, enhanced rule of law across the continent, redistribution of wealth and a decrease in disparity between living standards, labour mobility, better cultural understanding, the democratising effect it is having on it's non eu neighbours. e.g. Serbia, and most importantly it's led to France, Germany and UK actually collaborating with one another. Their are issues with how it's run but it's a really new institution, Just look at the evolution of the Federal government of the US, from nearly going bankrupt to the power it wields now.
Simply put we are stronger together than in competition
P.S. I'd like to hear what you feel as the 'implications of this goal'
Oh and so what if Obama is more socialist? Remember socialism is a matter of degree not an either/or, I can't imagine you complain too much about the socialist highway system or socialised police. Relative to the rest of the world (where their are quite a few countries run along socialist principles successfully) Obama is right wing and will remain so whatever his own personal predilections, mainly because moderate American is right
kill yourself
kill yourself
I'm inclined to agree but not to that extent. Done wishing death upon people.
I have no interest in joining any sort of Union with other countries or sharing the same currency and I'll fight for that to the death.
what's the issue with a union with Mexico and Canada or even beyond?
the same principles are working pretty well in Europe, enhanced rule of law across the continent, redistribution of wealth and a decrease in disparity between living standards, labour mobility, better cultural understanding, the democratising effect it is having on it's non eu neighbours. e.g. Serbia, and most importantly it's led to France, Germany and UK actually collaborating with one another. Their are issues with how it's run but it's a really new institution, Just look at the evolution of the Federal government of the US, from nearly going bankrupt to the power it wields now.
Simply put we are stronger together than in competition
P.S. I'd like to hear what you feel as the 'implications of this goal'
Oh and so what if Obama is more socialist? Remember socialism is a matter of degree not an either/or, I can't imagine you complain too much about the socialist highway system or socialised police. Relative to the rest of the world (where their are quite a few countries run along socialist principles successfully) Obama is right wing and will remain so whatever his own personal predilections, mainly because moderate American is right
I tried to find a face palm picture to post, but I couldn't find one big enough. What a horrible first post. I bet he's a paid member of the mossad here to spew nonsense.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.