no its a fisheye because of the curveture, wide-angles are pretty straight.Originally Posted by Kevinphan
no its a fisheye because of the curveture, wide-angles are pretty straight.Originally Posted by Kevinphan
!
a fisheye is specifically a 180 degree angle, its not a fisheye, its a wide angle.
He shot it on the D80 which I'm sure is a 1.6x crop and he shot it with a 15mm lens. Which makes it a 24mm wideangle with bad distortion.Originally Posted by Herman
its a cat fucktard.Originally Posted by digitalfilmmaker
Originally Posted by Kevinphan
Yea, 15mm. Digi sensors are smaller than 35mm. So its considered a fisheye on 35mm, and wide angle on digi. The distortion is not really that bad, at least not as bad as on the 35mm. The formula is just take the focal length of the lens (15mm) and multiply it by about 1.5 and thats the focal length(about 23mm) on a digi slr. And a 70mm lens would be equivalent to a 105mm, etc. I need that damn 10.5 but I aint got no funds.
And to further prove that I dont only shoot 15mm. Here's one I took tonight of Chad Haithcock (aka maybe_ebyam on here).
Once again one flash.
Chris
We had to skate these b/c of the rain (or mabe it was the tonado warning...haha) All photos by http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...ndid=156355082
All tricks by me, Chad Haithcock BS full Torque:
Same trick different angle.. i like the shadow of me doing tricks in my xsjados...
Topsoul 360 out:
![]()
I was asking what was the point of the picture itself and given your stupid reply I guess there's none...Originally Posted by craig
![]()
Finally got the d50 and picked up a used Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/3.5 AI Macro lens for $100 (manual focus, and needs a handheld meter).. Here are a couple photos I just took to test out the lens, all at 1/500 of a second using 2x sunpak 544 flashes bouncing off walls.. Unsharp mask was not used.
100% Crop
100% Crop
First shot in the car after buying lens
I think I love Nikon.
What I was trying to say is that a fisheye is defined by the distortion it produces, not just the mm or degree of coverage. You can have two 15mm lenses, one being a fisheye and one being a wide-angle, so the mm doesn't alone make it a fisheye or a wide angle. It's still a fisheye, just with a digicrop because of the lens distortion. For example I own the Sigma 15-30 wide-angle for my Canon, and it remains undistorted on a 1.6x crop, yet the Canon 15mm fisheye lens on my same camera is much more distorted.Originally Posted by Kevinphan
!
its a cat fucktardOriginally Posted by digitalfilmmaker
Originally Posted by Herman
no, actually the difference is defined by the angle of coverage. the distortation defines whether a fisheye is full frame or circular.
you are right about the mm length of the lens not beig the determining factor. you could have a 16mm fisheye lens (180 degree diagonal coverage) and a 14mm wide angle lens (114 degrees). the mm determines the focal length, not the actual curvature of the glass. the latter of those two lens examples has what is called a rectilinear design.
some pics of my friends, we lived together for about 3 years in Utrecht, a city in Holland.
Just some pics to show you how chill they are and to me it has some atmosphere of how good our time living together was, so easygoing.
I really love them.
well, almost speaks for itself but it's all film, scanned by myself on an old shitty scanner I got from my grandpa..bla bla ...if there are comments/questions just let me know.
thanks for looking. There is more on www.flickr.com/photos/dennisevers
Also some pics from my trip to New York and whatever more.
![]()
that purple shirt is fiyah, nice chill photos.
Originally Posted by craig
![]()
its a cat fucktard.Originally Posted by digitalfilmmaker
YOU MADE YOUR POINT, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?Originally Posted by craig
Hahahahaha
wuckin it.
Originally Posted by Davengo
dave gets the point.
Devon- Zero Spin
I needed another flash on him..
![]()
Bookmarks