Connect with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Summer Clash 2013
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 54

Thread: Can someone enlighten me on the UFS mounts discussion?

  1. #1

    Default Can someone enlighten me on the UFS mounts discussion?

    What's the story? Did they make them too close together? Anyone can give me the short version. Did they fuck up with the placement?

    Do you ever think about how skates would feel really good with an h-block mount that actually mounts into the boot as a central 3rd mount?

    I'm excited for my Bont skates to come because they have a 3 point mounting system.

  2. #2

    Default

    In the past I've felt the mounts are too close together to allow for the perfect groove with flat setups. Take the average foot size (US9) and corresponding average wheelbase (250mm), centre the mounts between outer & middle wheels and you get 167mm.....UFS does not account for splitting middle wheels. I think this limits the split for flat setups with the lowest possible stance height. Today's frames are proof, in order to stretch the split to 130mm or more they sacrifice the lower stance height.

    I think the mounts could be stretched to 180mm and still accommodate a small frame of 235-240mm wheelbase. This frame wouldn't have the 130+mm split, but the new standard would allow for an ideal flat setup without eliminating short frames. Another way of looking at it today's big-split frames (Element, SlimLine) could be made lower, and lowest frames (GC, Fifty-50) could make splits & grooves ideal for flat.

    I've considered some different opinions & new possibilities since, I'm interested to see where this thread goes.

  3. #3

    Default

    I ride 135mm frames so i would like the split to only be slightly bigger

    ive alwasy wanted a middle mount
    there just hasnt been a good way to do it myself since all frames are hollow right there,,
    K2 knew what was up!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    03.12.2003
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    I am fine with where the mounts are...I think the problem is frame companies have poorly designed "flat" frames. They offer horrible h-blocks with litte wheel protection. They try to compensate with widening the inner split but to do so they add frame height. If companies would stop making the h-blocks as close to the boot as possible we would not need such a wide split.

    IMO 1st Gen Ables are the best frames for flat. The h-block position is perfect. I bet they would of sold more frames if they came out with both rounded and triangular h-blocks. If they were smart they would bring back the original frames.

  5. #5

    Default

    another thing
    i think it would be very very easy for a boot company to make adjustable frame mounts
    to use a new system as well as the current one

  6. #6
    Mudhut Jollyrancher's Avatar
    Join Date
    19.03.2009
    Location
    Boston/Delaware
    Posts
    10,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justinthursday
    another thing
    i think it would be very very easy for a boot company to make adjustable frame mounts
    to use a new system as well as the current one
    yeah it would be now that i think of it

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justinthursday
    another thing
    i think it would be very very easy for a boot company to make adjustable frame mounts
    to use a new system as well as the current one
    The original Metric mounts were flippable, this allowed a short 225mm frame or a split of 120mm for the other lengths.

    And Razors has this in the works; http://www.google.com/patents?id=6TYUAAAAEBAJ

  8. #8
    Mudhut Jollyrancher's Avatar
    Join Date
    19.03.2009
    Location
    Boston/Delaware
    Posts
    10,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jakeordie
    Quote Originally Posted by justinthursday
    another thing
    i think it would be very very easy for a boot company to make adjustable frame mounts
    to use a new system as well as the current one
    The original Metric mounts were flippable, this allowed a short 225mm frame or a split of 120mm for the other lengths.

    And Razors has this in the works; http://www.google.com/patents?id=6TYUAAAAEBAJ
    razors =
    i wonder when those will come out, the patent was issued in 2005

  9. #9

    Default

    interesting that wagener used a remz shell for the skate diagram

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jomu
    interesting that wagener used a remz shell for the skate diagram
    its all Sunshine Dist. anyways

  11. #11

    Default

    yea ive seen that patent
    im talking even simpler than that hto

  12. #12

    Default

    Here's the drawing I did to show how everything fits together;



    235mm min wheelbase & 130mm max split, but not together.....unless you skate 52s flat.

  13. #13

    Default

    yes!
    how is the actual building of frmaes coming along jake?

  14. #14

    Join Date
    05.01.2004
    Location
    Rochester Hills, Michigan
    Posts
    10,302

    Default

    the razors thing looks like the kids size gen shell thats adjustable, is it not?
    Remember: "It is better to keep your [hands still] and appear stupid than to [respond] and remove all doubt."

  15. #15

    Join Date
    04.01.2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    4,348

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jakeordie
    Here's the drawing I did to show how everything fits together;



    235mm min wheelbase & 130mm max split, but not together.....unless you skate 52s flat.
    produce these, im really digging the wide ass groove

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Coe
    the razors thing looks like the kids size gen shell thats adjustable, is it not?
    I watched this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG7GKQCEDZ0 and it looks like a different setup to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by humphrey
    Quote Originally Posted by jakeordie
    Here's the drawing I did to show how everything fits together;



    235mm min wheelbase & 130mm max split, but not together.....unless you skate 52s flat.
    produce these, im really digging the wide ass groove
    Sure thing, what boots you gonna bolt on 'em?

  17. #17

    Join Date
    19.11.2003
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    5,151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by humphrey
    Quote Originally Posted by jakeordie
    Here's the drawing I did to show how everything fits together;



    235mm min wheelbase & 130mm max split, but not together.....unless you skate 52s flat.
    produce these, im really digging the wide ass groove
    FUKING FAIL. IF YOU WANT WIDE ASS STUPID GROOVES THEN BUY THE STREAMLINES/XJSJADO FRAMES YOU FUCKING KIKE

    wuckin it.

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by justinthursday
    how is the actual building of frmaes coming along jake?
    For now I've taken a different path towards the same end. Oli lined up the opportunity to advise the Powerslide engineers on how to fix the groove for the SlimLine 2. Here's what I sent them;



    I hear they are also modifying the frame like Al has been doing to SlimLine 1s, to allow flat 56s rockered up.

  19. #19

    Join Date
    20.09.2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    300

    Default

    Make these!

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jakeordie
    Quote Originally Posted by justinthursday
    how is the actual building of frmaes coming along jake?
    For now I've taken a different path towards the same end. Oli lined up the opportunity to advise the Powerslide engineers on how to fix the groove for the SlimLine 2. Here's what I sent them;



    I hear they are also modifying the frame like Al has been doing to SlimLine 1s, to allow flat 56s rockered up.
    i might pay $100 for that frame..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •