Battlefield 3

**Fiction** · 06.11.2011, 18:54

Servers will get better I'm sure and I do have fun sometimes on BF. It is more of a team oriented game and requires strategy. IW does have a problem with not patching things that def need to be patched I'll agree there. But there is no denying that COD will drastically do better than BF.

**MyGlockGoPopPopPop** · 06.11.2011, 19:17

Originally Posted by gen2roller

**Chris Fortune** · 06.11.2011, 19:48

Originally Posted by Fiction

really? no? haha You're very dilutional if you think it wont. COD not only will out sell that garbage 3:1 but will have triple the players on it. BF campaign (which I just finished today) was short, super glitchy and laggy, and was like watching a bad movie. (In the sense that it trys to throw a plot twist in at the end even though it gives you all the info throughout the game so the twist is known before the end) The online portion of the game, the servers are just as garb when it comes to glitching and lag, the graphics are in no improvement over bad company 2 (not saying MW3 is either because it is almost identical to MW2..except the added texturing, increased frame rate, and larger maps) COD sticks it to BF in almost every way. Although BF is more realistic warfare I will say that. Also I dont care for the dozen killstreaks in COD either. So sry but COD>BF.

In no way am I saying dont go get BF. But maybe wait until pricedrop... I will say go pick up COD because you wont be disappointed.

Edit: Oh and not to mention that the servers are constantly shutdown and back up and running.

COD is boring and has used the same engine for 5 years now. The game runs at a shit resolution on consoles and since its a port, its still going to look like crap on PC. Nice critique of the single player. You'd have to be high off your ass to think that was a twist thrown in. The story makes sense as soon as you're the Russians. Glitching and lag? I don't know what you play on but I haven't seen anyone glitch on PC and don't have any problems with lag. Servers are also plentiful. I think you're just being cynical because you enjoy playing expansion packs vs new games.

**Fiction** · 06.11.2011, 20:06

hahahahahaha. ok.

**Kent** · 06.11.2011, 20:35

Originally Posted by Fiction

COD not only will out sell that garbage 3:1 but will have triple the players on it.

**ryanmatthewdaily** · 06.11.2011, 20:42

Originally Posted by gen2roller

so much goodness in this thread

**NathanC** · 06.11.2011, 20:44

Originally Posted by Chris Fortune

COD is boring and has used the same engine for 5 years now. The game runs at a shit resolution on consoles and since its a port, its still going to look like crap on PC. Nice critique of the single player. You'd have to be high off your ass to think that was a twist thrown in. The story makes sense as soon as you're the Russians. Glitching and lag? I don't know what you play on but I haven't seen anyone glitch on PC and don't have any problems with lag. Servers are also plentiful. I think you're just being cynical because you enjoy playing expansion packs vs new games.

Updated engine mind you. Even the bioshock dudes are using Unreal3 for infinite. That being the case, I can't really hold that against them. I totally agree though, There needs to be a large leap forward in the area of graphics soon. (I don't want to say consoles are holding PC gamer's back, but its somewhat true.)

Battlefield 3 looks great on the frostbite, I'm not understanding the attack on them for that. As far as servers problems go...

says it in the beginning.

EA games

seriously though, I hate EA. A lot of times they don't give their developers enough time to finish the product. (or too little) whatever tho

**Fiction** · 06.11.2011, 21:13